Spring Term
2018 has come and gone, and somehow I continue to be on track to complete the M
Arch program by next May. Translation: “somehow” means a little luck and a lot of
very long hours.
One thing I
have to say for architecture is that it fosters a continual process of getting
to know oneself, and in many different ways.
What is important to me? What am
I good at, and what are my weaknesses?
What resonates for me, and what seems like bullshit? What advice do I follow, and what should I
simply dismiss? How can I balance what
is of interest to me with what is expected of me in the classroom?
Last week I
happened to read the January post for a New York Times series on leading a
better life. This particular treatise
explores creativity and points out the importance of downtime to let ideas
percolate. I couldn’t agree more, but it
seems my teachers couldn’t agree less. The
pace is relentless, and in my mind, it can be antithetical to careful and considered
creativity.
I am slow.
I like to explore many different ideas and paths, and I embrace logic, method,
and meaning along the way. I keep
hoping, as with any endeavor, that intuition and self-confidence will gradually
kick in and that I will be able to generate ideas more quickly, test them more
efficiently, and reach the final critique with fewer parts lagging. Of course, efficiency and deadlines are the
stuff of architectural practice, so I do need to learn these lessons. And here is my ear worm, in the words of
Leonard Bernstein, “You need a plan and you need not quite enough time.”
No comments:
Post a Comment